Pages

Friday, 5 April 2013

Discharge by Performance & Types

Discharge by Performance
The contract comes to an end when both parties fulfill their respective duties by performing the acts they have promised.
Types of Performance:
§ Complete Performance.
§ Substantial Performance (minor breach).
§ Performance to the Satisfaction of One of the Parties or a Third Party.
Case 16.1: Jacobs & Young v. Kent (1921).

Conditions & Types of Conditions


Conditions


Possible future event, the occurrence or nonoccurrence of which will trigger the performance of a legal obligation or terminate an existing obligation under a contract.

Types of Conditions:


§ Conditions Precedent.
§ Conditions Subsequent.
§ Conditions Concurrent.
    Express.
    Implied in Fact.
    Implied in Law.

Contracts: Performance and Discharge


Contracts: Performance and Discharge


Introduction
How does a party know when his or her obligations under the contract are at an end?
A party may be discharged from a valid contract by:
§ A condition occurring or not occurring.
§ Full performance or material breach by the other party.
§ Agreement of the parties.
§ Operation of law.

Saturday, 30 March 2013

Delegation


Delegation


Contractual duties in a bilateral contract that are delegated to a 3rd party.

Duties That Cannot be Delegated


When special trust has been placed on the obligor.
When performance requires personal skill or talents.
When performance will vary materially from obligee expectations.
When the contract expressly prohibits delegation.

Effect of a Delegation


Delegator remains liable.
Delegatee liable if delegation contract creates a third party beneficiary relationship in the obligee.

Assignment of “All Rights”


Assignment of rights and a delegation of duties.

Third Party Beneficiaries


Original parties to the contract intend at the time of contracting that the contract performance directly benefits a third person.

Types of Intended Beneficiaries


ü Creditor Beneficiaries.
ü Donee Beneficiaries.
ü Modern View:  Does not draw such clear lines and distinguishes only between intended beneficiaries and incidental beneficiaries.

The Vesting of an Intended Beneficiary’s Rights


For third party beneficiary contract to be effective, rights under the contract must vest:
§ Third party’s manifesting assent to the contract.
§ Third party’s materially altering position in detrimental reliance on the contract.

Intended v. Incidental Beneficiaries


Intended:
Promisee intended to confer on the beneficiary the right to bring suit to enforce the contract.
Factors:
    Performance is rendered directly to 3rd party.
    3rd party’s right to control contract details.
    3rd party expressly designated as beneficiary.
Incidental.
§ Contract between two parties is unintentional.
§ Incidental beneficiary cannot sue to enforce the contract.
Case 15.3: Vogan v. Hayes Appraisal Associates, Inc. (1999).

Contracts: Third Party Rights


Contracts: Third Party Rights


Introduction
Only the Parties to a contract have rights and liabilities under the contract.
Exceptions:
§ Assignment or Delegation.
§ Third party beneficiary contract.

Assignments and Delegations


Transfer of contractual rights is an assignment.
Transfer of contractual duties is a delegation.
Assignments
Rights cannot be assigned:
§ If the assignment is contrary to statute.
§ When a contract is personal in nature.
§ Assignment materially changes rights or duties of obligor.
§ If the contract stipulates the right cannot be assigned.
Case 15.1: Forest Commodity v. Lone Star (2002).
Valid notice must be given to all parties.
Case 15.2: Gold v. Ziff Communications (2001).

Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule


Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule

ü   Contracts subsequently modified.
ü   Voidable or Void contracts.
ü   Contracts containing ambiguous terms.
ü   Prior dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade.
ü   Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule 
ü   Contracts subject to orally agreed-on conditions.
ü   Contracts with an obvious or gross clerical error that clearly would not represent the agreement of the parties. 
Case 14.4: Cousins Sub Systems v. McKinney (1999).

Parol Evidence Rule


Parol Evidence Rule

Oral representations or promises made prior to the contract’s formation or at the time the contract was created, may not be admitted in court.
Integrated Contracts.

Sufficiency of the Writing


Sufficiency of the Writing


Under the Statue of Frauds.
§ Must name, identify subject matter, consideration, other essential terms, and must be signed by the the party against whom enforcement is sought.
Under the UCC.
§ Need only name the quantity term and be signed by the party to be charged.
Case 14.3: Interstate Litho Corp. v. Brown (2001)

The Statute of Frauds


The Statute of Frauds


To be enforceable, the following types of contracts must be in writing and signed:
§ Contracts involving interest in land.
§ Contracts involving “One Year Rule.”
§ Collateral or Secondary Contracts.
§ Promise made in consideration of marriage.
§ Contracts for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more.

Contracts Involving Interests in Land


Land includes all physical objects that are permanently attached to the soil: buildings, fences, trees, and the soil itself.
All contracts for the transfer of other interest in land: mortgages and leases.
Case 14.1: Michel v. Bush (2001).

The One-Year Rule


A contract that cannot, by its own terms, be performed within one year from the date it was formed must be in writing to be enforceable.
One-year period begins to run the day after the contract is made.
§ Test:  Whether performance is possible             (although unlikely) within one year.

Collateral Promises


Primary v. Secondary Obligations.
“Main Purpose Rule” Exception .
Estate Debts.

Promises Made in Consideration of Marriage


Prenuptial agreements must be in writing and signed to be enforceable.
Contracts must be supported by some consideration to be enforceable.
Prenuptial agreements may not be enforceable if the agreement is not voluntary.

Contracts for the Sale of Goods


UCC requires a writing or memorandum for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more. Exceptions:
§ Partial Performance.
§ Admissions.
§ Promissory Estoppel.
§ Special Exceptions under the UCC.

Origins of the Statute of Frauds


Origins of the Statute of Frauds


1677 England passed the law “An Act for the Prevention of Frauds and Abuses.”
Certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought to be enforceable.
Today, almost every state has a Statute of Frauds.